When you re-added the quote, (then w/ sources), all your summary stated was " restore material deleted without explanation, with citations to support its relevance". As for REVEXP, you realize that's an essay, right? When you first added the Leon quote, (without sources btw), you didn't add an edit summary yourself. still going on about the edit summary? We've both been on WP long enough to know that disputed article content is discussed on article talk pages, and your "reminder" was needless, if not tactless. How is this context irrelevant? - Jason A. The citations I added (guessing at the nature of your objection) established that 1) those were also Leon Kowalski's last words, 2) Roy Batty echoes them exactly in the monologue, 3) this connection isn't original research (death-on-a-schedule being a central theme). The reason I added this information should be self-evident: It describes an earlier scene that provides context for a key line of the monologue. I commented on your Talk page to remind you.
wolf 14:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC) Reply You've been around Wikipedia long enough to know the importance of meaningful edit summaries when reverting. You go to the article talk page and state why you belive the content should be added, and it goes from there.Īs it stands, I don't see the relevancy in the quote you added. You open a discussion by opening a discussion. Quest ( talk) 14:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC) Reply I think you've been around long enough to know the BRD process. JasonAQuest: How am I supposed to open a discussion when I don't know what your objection is to the material I added to Tears in rain monologue? Just "rv" is a rather unhelpful edit summary, except in cases of obvious error or vandalism, which my addition was not. Death Wikipedia:WikiProject Death Template:WikiProject Death Death articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Science Fiction Wikipedia:WikiProject Science Fiction Template:WikiProject Science Fiction science fiction articles This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia.